St Johns Crusaders v Aylsham Spitfires

NCCA League Division 1 Thu 23rd Nov 2023   Verify
BoardHomeSt Johns CrusadersAylsham SpitfiresAway
1 (B) 2119
G
Moore, Geoffrey R
½ - ½
G
Slough, Andrew JS
1905
2 (W) 1965
G
Hall, Antony C
½ - ½
S
Hedges, Daniel R
1857
3 (B) 1862
S
Palaneappan, Senthil Murugan
½ - ½
B
Owen, David M
1743
4 (W) 1972
G
Abbott, Nathan J
1 - 0
L
Wickham, John R
1688
Adjustment-1 - 1
Penalty1 - 0
Total7918 ½ - 2½Total7193

Last update Stephen Livermore Fri 24th Nov 2023 12:23. Reported by Daniel Hedges Fri 24th Nov 2023 09:50. Verified By mark lim Fri 24th Nov 2023 11:53

Comments

Please note that the grading difference between board 3 and 4 was over the 100 point limit for St Johns Crusaders

slivermore's picture

I will apply the penalty in accordance with Rule 4 (reproduced below for easy reference). I can confirm that the Board 4 result with however stand for rating purposes.

slivermore's picture

4 (a) Teams are to consist of four players arranged in order of playing strength, unless changed by
subsequent rules, subject to where two players have a difference of more than 100 rating points then the higher
rated player is to play on a higher board than the lower rated one.

(b) Any contravention of this rule will attract a penalty as follows: the game played by the higher rated
player(s) will be recorded as a win for his opponent(s) and in addition there will be a penalty deduction of 1
point for each offending player.

sorton's picture

I notice that Nathan Abbott's September rating, which is what LMS shows as the main rating, was 1950, i.e. less than 100 above the board 3 rating. So this could be a misunderstand of which rating to use, for which I have much sympathy.